The following are different design options for the adaptive reuse of the Pullman Train Depot to create an art gallery, studio, and residence. What you see is the top of the building at an 1/8" plan. The main focus was to divide up the three different spaces of the building, and to create a distanct difference between the public and private spaces. Also the gallery space needed a particular flow to it. I tried numerous flows such as free spatial, double load, and radial. None of which particularly worked best for my gallery. Doing this before creating my floor plan helped me such much in understanding the flow as well as that important aspect of making sure the public and private spaces are seperate. After doing this though I had realized that I was making my residential space bigger than necessary and I could greatly increase my gallery space.
Design Philosophy
I grew up with a Mom who would paint a new room in our house every month and would constantly change furniture arrangements. Before I knew it I was in my room rearranging furniture once a month and constantly painting my walls and finding new bed comforters etc. It was then that I realized I was developing a passion to design rooms in my home and make frequent trips to Ikea, what seemed to be my new favorite store. It's the way you can show your style through design and have multiple inspirations that create something that I love about design.
Friday, April 6, 2012
Depot Design- Study Models
The following are different design options for the adaptive reuse of the Pullman Train Depot to create an art gallery, studio, and residence. What you see is the top of the building at an 1/8" plan. The main focus was to divide up the three different spaces of the building, and to create a distanct difference between the public and private spaces. Also the gallery space needed a particular flow to it. I tried numerous flows such as free spatial, double load, and radial. None of which particularly worked best for my gallery. Doing this before creating my floor plan helped me such much in understanding the flow as well as that important aspect of making sure the public and private spaces are seperate. After doing this though I had realized that I was making my residential space bigger than necessary and I could greatly increase my gallery space.
Depot Concept Model
The idea generator for the concept model is the final parti that was also used for the textile design.Instead of keeping the parti in 2D, I decided to explore the concepts further more and create a 3D form that can be viewed in all views (therefore not having a base). While using the final parti I also looked back to my original inspiration many times.
The form givers for the concept model are unity, connection, contrast, strong lines, as well as curved lines. The connection goes back to my original inspiration of the two wheels being connected, working together, but not touching. The contrast was also from my inspiration picure of the dark black train and the grey gloomy sky. The curved and bold straight lines came from the train wheels.
The form giver are applied in the final concept model in the way the shape was created as well as the 2 contrasting colors. There are 3 strong bold lines that on each end have curved crossing lines all of which was made out of foam core. There is a quick connection of the curved lines but they are not touching relating back to the wheels. The colors black and white were chosen relate back to the contrast of the sky.
Final parti used for concept model
Final Concept Model- 3D
Creating My Own Textile
In the concept development process of designing my depot into a gallery, studio, and residence, I was able to get the chance to create numerous patterns and in the end pick out the best to be created into a textile fabric. There were many steps before creating the final product but I started by first having an inspiration. My inspiration was from a picture I took at the Pullman Train Depot. Outside of the depot was a broken down train and it grabbed my attention from the way it stood with the gloomy sky behind it. The train consisted of many elements and principals of design. I used those design principals and elements to create abstract modules. The modules had straight bold lines, curved lines, unity, connection, and contrast. After creating several abstract modules, I selected two that I thought showed my inspiration best in an abstract way. With those 2 modules I used Photoshop and InDesign to edit, crop, rotate, and repeat to create different patterns with different color schemes to use for my textile. Eventually I choose a final pattern and color schemed which my final 36”x36” textile. The final textile still consisted of principals and elements of design from the original inspiration such as strong bold lines, curved lines, connection, and unity. There were many color schemes that worked with my pattern but I ended up choosing the original colors of the train for my textile; red, black and white. When my fabric came in off of ordering from SpoonFlower, a 36”x36” piece of fabric with my textile, I wasn’t surprised at all, for it had turned out just the way I had ordered. I really like my pattern but I do wish I could’ve done a better job and making the lines match up a little better. Also I wish I had considered making my scale smaller. The module was placed at 3”x3” the original size, but I wish I had done it just a half inch smaller. Overall the process of creating a fabric is very long, but it was definatley worth the process because you get to see how many options you have. I am pleased with my very first created fabric but I know in the future I can do better and I plan to be more careful about matching the modules up. This textile will be used in 3D form in my final plan of the depot. I plan on using it as a 3 form panel that is partially transparent, behind the reception desk so it gives a little divider.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Mike Jobes: "Future Primitive"
Future Primitive Mike Jobes
April 4, 6:00 pm, Carpenter Hall 102
Mike continued on to describe some trips that he has taken. He goes to Israel a lot because his wife lives there. One particular thing that Mike loves is the open air markets. They are outside but if it rained there was shade. The food comes directly from farmers and it’s not over controlled. Down in Los Angeles, California, Mike has a ton of favorite restaurants. All of which are from strip malls. He questioned why strip malls? Because they are open to first generation families, several real cultures and real food. The strip malls may be ugly but they contain so much culture.
He jumped back to cities and natural life being connected. “Living City: interconnecting natural life and urban city”. He then showed on the slideshow Capitol Hill in Seattle. An area in Seattle that I personally have been to numerous times. I could picture it in my head right then and there. But it wasn’t the Capitol Hill that I knew that he had shown. It was literally a living city; one street would be filled with buildings and the street right next to it was full of trees and plants, then the street next to it buildings again, and the street next to that nature again. And repeated this throughout Capitol Hill. He questioned the room full of students and just in general: “Can you ever get the city so clean you can actually have salmon spawn?” He and us all knew that answer was clear that, that was impossible. But it was more of the concept behind the question, how clean can we actually get the city. He continued to show more and more unrealistic pictures of combining nature and the city. It was so interesting to consider and it made me want the cities to look like how he made them.
Mike then talked about natural hybrids. I was confused at first but he gave a variety of examples such as how in today’s world we can take things out of their natural environment and create the same environment with technology and they can live just perfect. Another was the example of the Tower of David in Venezuela. 45 story tower that is completely unfinished with missing windows, walls, and elevators and yet homeless people have seen to taken over the building and have been living in the city but without any electricity, etc for them so in a way Mike considers it a natural hybrid.
One of Mike’s most recent projects is actually with Habitat for Humanity. Something I can easily relate to considering me and my classmates had spent several weeks creating possible home plans for them. He praised double stud walls (which I now know a lot of knowledge about from earlier in the year) and said that they will not go away! They also were going to put a bladder type thing under the house, as a rain water system for flushing which I found interesting. As well as they would have fewer windows to make sure air wouldn’t leak out.
Overall I enjoyed Mike’s “Future Primitive” speech extremely interesting. There were times when I was a little confused about some of his contrasting phrases but he did a great job of explaining everything very clearly. He was a great speaker and I’m interested to hear more from him in the future.
NOTES AND SKETCHES :
April 4, 6:00 pm, Carpenter Hall 102
When first reading about the quick notes of what the Mike Jobes lecture was going to be about I was unclear of what he would speak about. The first minute of his presentation, made it clear, he would talk about sustainability. His first line was that he felt, sustainability, has been hijacked. I at the beginning of the presentation disagreed but by the end it made a lot more sense what he meant. He started off by putting up a slide show of phrases. Phrases that we don’t ever see or hear; they were contrasting. The phrases consisted of today’s world, like cities, and urban combined with words like wild, forest and ancient.
Mike made it clear that he was a huge fan of dense urban areas as well as natural life. He questioned if those could ever fit together and if so he would call it urban wild; one of the first phrases Mike put up at the beginning. I was quickly confused because I thought we already had places like that. I first thought of Seattle. Such a big famous city, but is surrounded by parks and mountains and tons of greens. But Mike meant literally putting the two right next to each, not just next to each but intertwined. Mike continued on to describe some trips that he has taken. He goes to Israel a lot because his wife lives there. One particular thing that Mike loves is the open air markets. They are outside but if it rained there was shade. The food comes directly from farmers and it’s not over controlled. Down in Los Angeles, California, Mike has a ton of favorite restaurants. All of which are from strip malls. He questioned why strip malls? Because they are open to first generation families, several real cultures and real food. The strip malls may be ugly but they contain so much culture.
He jumped back to cities and natural life being connected. “Living City: interconnecting natural life and urban city”. He then showed on the slideshow Capitol Hill in Seattle. An area in Seattle that I personally have been to numerous times. I could picture it in my head right then and there. But it wasn’t the Capitol Hill that I knew that he had shown. It was literally a living city; one street would be filled with buildings and the street right next to it was full of trees and plants, then the street next to it buildings again, and the street next to that nature again. And repeated this throughout Capitol Hill. He questioned the room full of students and just in general: “Can you ever get the city so clean you can actually have salmon spawn?” He and us all knew that answer was clear that, that was impossible. But it was more of the concept behind the question, how clean can we actually get the city. He continued to show more and more unrealistic pictures of combining nature and the city. It was so interesting to consider and it made me want the cities to look like how he made them.
Mike then talked about natural hybrids. I was confused at first but he gave a variety of examples such as how in today’s world we can take things out of their natural environment and create the same environment with technology and they can live just perfect. Another was the example of the Tower of David in Venezuela. 45 story tower that is completely unfinished with missing windows, walls, and elevators and yet homeless people have seen to taken over the building and have been living in the city but without any electricity, etc for them so in a way Mike considers it a natural hybrid.
One of Mike’s most recent projects is actually with Habitat for Humanity. Something I can easily relate to considering me and my classmates had spent several weeks creating possible home plans for them. He praised double stud walls (which I now know a lot of knowledge about from earlier in the year) and said that they will not go away! They also were going to put a bladder type thing under the house, as a rain water system for flushing which I found interesting. As well as they would have fewer windows to make sure air wouldn’t leak out.
Overall I enjoyed Mike’s “Future Primitive” speech extremely interesting. There were times when I was a little confused about some of his contrasting phrases but he did a great job of explaining everything very clearly. He was a great speaker and I’m interested to hear more from him in the future.
NOTES AND SKETCHES :
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)